In our Canon 10x42L IS WP binoculars review, we thought that even though they are pricey, they are almost perfect for hand-held astronomy, so we believe the cost is justified if you can afford it. While we've picked out the 10x42 pair as ideal for astronomy, there are alternatives in the range, including Canon 18x50 IS AW and Canon 15x50 IS AW models that are not quite as painful on the wallet. Second, their premium quality comes with a higher price tag that might be too much for some stargazers. First, because of the stabilization technology and the battery, they're on the heavy side, weighing 39.2 oz (1.1kg). While these binoculars are impressive, they come with a couple of minor downsides. You can expect sharp, bright, and stable views through these excellent binos.
The glass is identical to those used in Canon camera lenses, and it has the 'L' designation that distinguishes some of the best and most expensive lenses ever to be used with a digital sensor. Alternatively, if you need something to photograph the night sky be sure to read our best cameras for photos and videos or best cameras for astrophotography pages. For this guide, we've searched through our extensive range of binocular reviews from our expert panel, where we've thoroughly tested and rated models based on their performance and real-world use, not just ranked them based on the binoculars' numbers and specifications.īut if you need something more specific check out the best compact binoculars guide for something smaller or our best binoculars for kids page. Some binoculars are so good for astronomy that they can be a budget-friendly alternative to the best telescopes and still provide excellent night sky views. They will also provide strong magnification to make those tiny specks of light from deep space appear much larger. They'll need to have large objective lenses (the ones facing the stars) to let in as much of the faint starlight as possible.
There are some important features to consider when you're choosing the best binoculars for stargazing.
0 kommentar(er)
